summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/test
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2013-01-28pactest: handle non-default scriptlet shellsAllan McRae8-3/+20
pacman can be configured to use a different shell than /bin/sh for scriplets. Pass the cnfigured value to the pactest suite and make the necessary "copy" of the shell in the test root. Also update all copyright years in the pactest suite. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2013-01-28Revert execvp and related commitsAllan McRae3-25/+3
This reverts commit 4a8c2852a887d2b1aaa43be3071ab586eb24b9e3. This reverts commit 993700bc6b12cd291544d2a22845f480e8a7925e. This reverts commit bb4d2b72c1d35ab9d65d632be0dcaf00cfa7d600. This reverts commit 60b192e3836a150eb6950ce52241efebbee00f11. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2013-01-17pmtest: resolve path to scriptlet shellAllan McRae3-3/+25
In order to support a variety of values for the --with-scriptlet-shell configure flag, pmtest has to be aware of what kind of path was passed, be it an absolute path or a fragment for a path lookup. For absolute paths, leave the path alone. For fragments, search the PATH environment var for the resolved path to the binary. In both cases, join the resultant path to the root directory defined for the test, not a pre-determined bin directory. Fixes FS#31552. With-contribution-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2013-01-04Save backup files with extension .pacsave.nPang Yan Han1-0/+20
Teach pacman to save backup files with extension .pacsave.n, where n is a positive integer. The current backup file shall be saved as <name>.pacsave, while existing .pacsave.n files will be renamed to <name>.pacsave.n+1 Example: 1. You have subversion installed in your local repo. /etc/conf.d/svnserve is a file to be backed up. It contains local modifications 2. You remove subversion from your repo. /etc/conf.d/svnserve is backed up as /etc/conf.d/svnserve.pacsave 2. You install subversion again 3. You edit /etc/conf.d/svnserve 4. You remove subversion. The existing /etc/conf.d/svnserve.pacsave is renamed to /etc/conf.d/svnserve.pacsave.1 and /etc/conf.d/svnserve is backed up as /etc/conf.d/svnserve.pacsave Signed-off-by: Pang Yan Han <pangyanhan@gmail.com> Rebased from original email and adjusted for util-common usage. Signed-off-by: Florian Pritz <bluewind@xinu.at> Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2012-12-14Add pactest for "Optional for" outputBenedikt Morbach1-0/+13
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2012-12-14Add pactests for displaying optdep installation statusBenedikt Morbach2-0/+27
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2012-12-14It turns out we do care about directories...Allan McRae2-4/+0
This is a bug that has been around since at least 2007. On a package upgrade (either by -S or -U) a new directory could overwrite any file. This is caused by the filelist difference calculation ignoring all directories and thus no new directories were checked for conflicting files on the filesystem. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2012-12-14Add pactests for not detecting directory conflicts with upgradesFlorian Pritz2-0/+38
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2012-12-14Fix overzealous package removal with unmet dependenciesAndrew Gregory3-6/+0
Signed-off-by: Andrew Gregory <andrew.gregory.8@gmail.com> [Allan: Remove expected failure from fixed pactests] Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2012-12-14pactest: variant of package removal due to unmet dependenciesAllan McRae1-0/+28
Duplicate of sync140.py but with the alphabetical ordering of the packages changed. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2012-12-14pactest: removal of packages with unmet dependenciesAllan McRae1-0/+28
Provide a package for removing packages with unmet dependencies. Currently pacman removes too many packages from the transaction (FS#30649). Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2012-12-14Avoid upgrade conflict with unchanged effective pathAllan McRae1-2/+0
This applies to a case such as when /lib is a symlink to /usr/lib. If a package is installed which contains /lib/libfoo.so, pacman will complain if this package is then "fixed" to contain /usr/lib/libfoo.so. Since these have the same effective path and it exists within the same package, ignore the conflict. Fixes FS#30681. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2012-12-14Resolve file paths during inter-package conflict checkAllan McRae3-4/+26
File paths are resolved if necessary during inter-package conflict checks so that packages carrying the same effective file due to directory symlinks on the filesystem are flagged as conflicting. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2012-12-14Detect inter-package conflicts between files and directoriesAllan McRae2-4/+0
Detect a conflict between a file/symlink in one package and a directory in another when both are being installed at once. A side effect is the creation of conflicts between a directory symlink and a real directory (e.g lib -> usr/lib in pkg1 and /lib in pkg2). Given we can not guarantee pkg1 is installed before pkg2, this is a genuine conflict. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2012-12-14pactest: Provide a full filelist to the pactests that need itAllan McRae2-4/+11
It turns out when you set the filelist for a package to include "usr/lib/foo" in the pactest suite, it thinks there is only the file "usr/lib/foo" in there... No "usr/" or "usr/lib/" directory. This makes life difficult when testing code that scrolls through a filelist looking for directory entries. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2012-09-18Merge branch 'maint'Dan McGee1-1/+4
2012-09-18pactest: allow running with valgrind from any directoryAllan McRae1-1/+4
When using the --valgrind flag with the pactest.py script, the path to the suppression file relies on the script being called from the source root directory. Construct the path from the scripts location to allow it to be called from directory. Dan: style cleanup. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2012-08-07fixed typoBarbu Paul - Gheorghe1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Barbu Paul - Gheorghe <barbu.paul.gheorghe@gmail.com>
2012-08-02pactest: avoid upgrade conflict with unchanged effective pathDave Reisner1-0/+22
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2012-08-02pactest: Do not remove symlink to directory if a to be installed package uses itAllan McRae2-0/+44
If a pacakge has a directory symlink (e.g. /lib -> usr/lib), do not allow it to be removed if any other package is trying to install a file into that path (e.g. /lib/foo). This is because the local database can become invalidated if the symlink is removed after the package with file /lib/foo is installed (sync702.py). If the symlink is removed before the file is installed (sync701.py), the upgrade is actually a success, but we can not guarantee the ordering so both cases should fail. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2012-08-02pactest: Do not remove symlink to directory if local package uses that pathAllan McRae1-0/+22
If we have a symlink to a directory (e.g. /lib -> usr/lib), then we can not remove it if a local package thinks it has files in the symlink directory (e.g. /lib/foo), because this will invalidate the local file database. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2012-08-02pactest: conflict between files having same effective pathAllan McRae1-0/+23
Note failure to detect a conflict between files having the same effective path across packages due to a directory symlink. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2012-08-02pactest: conflict between directory and a fileAllan McRae1-0/+17
Note failure to detect a conflict between a directory in one package and a file in the other when the directory is not currently on the filesystem. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2012-08-02Add pactest for empty subdirectory conflictAllan McRae2-1/+18
The wrong test file was inadvertantly committed in 44e9fdd0. Add the correct test and tidy up the test which was committed. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2012-07-10Merge branch 'maint'Dan McGee3-0/+57
Conflicts: etc/makepkg.conf.in
2012-07-10Check empty subdirectory ownershipAllan McRae1-0/+17
When checking if a package owns a directory, it is important to check not only that all the files in the directory are part of the package, but also if the directory is part of a package. This catches empty subdirectories during conflict checking for directory to file/symlink replacements. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2012-07-10Add conflict for replacing owned empty directoryAllan McRae2-0/+40
When two packages own an empty directory, pacman finds no conflict when one of those packages wants to replace the directory with a file or a symlink. When it comes to actually extracting the new file/symlink, pacman sees the directory is still there (we do not remove empty directories if they are owned by a package) and refuses to extract. Detect this potential conflict early and bail. Note that it is a _potential_ conflict and not a guaranteed one as the other package owning the directory could be updated or removed first which would remove the conflict. However, pacman currently can not sort package installation order to ensure this, so this conflict requires manual upgrade ordering. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2012-06-25Scripts testsuite output consistencyAllan McRae2-4/+4
Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2012-06-25scripts/library: add human_to_sizeDave Reisner2-1/+77
This is a bash wrapper around an awk function that parses human readable sizes and returns their representative values in bytes, as a string. A small test harness is added to validate the functionality. Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org>
2012-06-25query: avoid false ownership matches for files in rootDave Reisner1-0/+11
Check for an exact match when querying ownership of files in the root. Previously, our test was too simple and would match the the basename of package files against the query parameter, e.g. $ pacman -Qo config /config is owned by cower-git 20120614-1 Adds a new test to verify this behavior, query007.py. Fixes FS#30388. Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2012-04-24scripts/library: introduce parseoptsDave Reisner2-0/+147
This will replace our current options parser used in pacman-key, makepkg, and ideally elsewhere. It follows heuristics closer to that of GNU getopt long (and thus pacman itself), with the exception that it does not allow for options with optional arguments. Due to the way this parser will be used, this sort of functionality will not be needed. Instead of relying on eval+set, options are normalized into an array, OPTRET, which callers should expect to be populated after returning from parseopts. This avoids problems with quotes and spaces in arguments, assuming that the user quotes properly when passing into the application. A new test harness for parseopts is added in test/scripts. Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org>
2012-04-12Remove SyncFirst optionDan McGee6-201/+0
This has outlived its usefulness and causes more problems than it solves. It has historically only ever been used to install pacman first. That should not be needed given we provide the vercmp utility (which has no library dependencies) and so calling pacman in install scripts is a sign of poor packaging. Work-duplicated-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2012-03-16pactest: make OPTDEPEND rule look at non-description onlyDan McGee1-2/+5
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2012-03-08Point python shebangs at python2Allan McRae8-8/+8
Python PEP-394 states that all python code should point at the python2 or python3 symlinks at maintain cross-distro compatibility. Note that this does not matter when calling these scripts using "make check" as they are explictly called using the detected python version. As this only affects manually calling these scripts, I have not had configure/make replace the shebangs. Signed-off-by: Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>
2012-02-20Merge branch 'maint'Dan McGee6-22/+12
Conflicts: contrib/pacsysclean.in src/pacman/conf.h
2012-02-15Revert "Add -S --recursive operation"Dan McGee3-12/+8
This reverts commit f3fa77bcf1d792971c314f8c0de255866e89f3f3 along with making other necessary changes to fully back this (mis)feature out until we can do it correctly. The quick summary here is this was not implemented correctly; provides are not fully taken into account in this logic, and making that happen exposes a lot of other flaws in this code that are covered up later on in the dependency resolving process by several other pieces of convoluted and conditional logic. Tests have been adjusted accordingly. Some test EXISTS conditions have been removed as we already know the package is installed locally, and we also are checking the VERSION condition anyway. With these two related revert commits, we do have some changes in test pass/fail results: * upgrade078.py: does not pass, this is due to --recursive getting removed for -U/-S operations after this commit. * sync302.py: the version checks have been disabled, so this test continues to pass but has been scaled back in scope. * sync303.py: now passes, was failing before. * sync304.py: still failing, was failing before. * sync305.py: now passes, was failing before. * sync306.py: still passes, was passing before. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2012-02-15Revert "Enable recursive/needed sync on SyncFirst"Dan McGee3-10/+4
This reverts commit 09034520325efcc2e684f05fa7a99c02bad1f5be. Tests affected by this revert have been adjusted; additionally a few EXIST tests have been removed where there is already a VERSION test doing the job for us. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2012-02-06Merge branch 'maint'Dan McGee4-0/+4
Conflicts: lib/libalpm/alpm_list.c
2012-02-03pactest: check return code in some upgrade testsDan McGee4-0/+4
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2012-01-02Merge branch 'maint'Dan McGee2-0/+130
Conflicts: doc/Makefile.am
2012-01-02add new pactest for syncfirst with recursive depsDave Reisner2-0/+130
Add 1 failing for the -Su case, and the same case using -S (and passing). This is based on a real (current) issue of upgrading staging chroots with the new pacman in staging for a libarchive build, and a new toolchain in testing. Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-12-08Use automake verbose helpers in custom make rulesDan McGee1-6/+4
This converts our script generation to use the built-in AM_V_GEN macro, which honors the V= setting passed to make and allows one to see the full command if they truly desire. The AM_V_at macro is also used in place of an explicit @ so verbose-mode compiles show all commands being run. We can also use these two macros in doc generation to quiet it down to the level we expect. Other minor changes: * a pointless test call is removed in test/pacman/tests/ * sed is used instead of dos2unix as we depend on it anyway * consecutive chmod calls are reduced to a single call (e.g., '+x,a-x') Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-11-30Merge branch 'maint'Dan McGee2-0/+65
2011-11-30Add two new pactests for pacman upgrade behaviorDan McGee2-0/+65
Both currently marked as failing. * sync303.py encapsulates the broken behavior reported in FS#27214. * sync304.py shows how packages depending on a specific version of a package in SyncFirst can cause breakage of the dependency resolver. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-11-13add fnmatch support for HoldPkgDave Reisner1-0/+11
Adds test remove031. Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org>
2011-11-13add support for back end fnmatch'd optionsDave Reisner4-0/+87
This is work originally provided by Sascha Kruse on FS#20360 with only minor adjustments to the implementation. It's been expanded to cover: NoUpgrade, NoExtract, IgnorePkg, IgnoreGroup. Adds tests ignore008, sync139, sync502, and sync503. Also satisfies FS#18988. Original-work-by: Sascha Kruse <knopwob@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner <dreisner@archlinux.org>
2011-11-01Merge branch 'maint'Dan McGee4-1/+73
2011-10-26Fix issues with replacing unowned symlinksDan McGee2-4/+0
There aretwo seperate issues in the same block of file conflict checking code here: 1) If realpath errored, such as when a symlink was broken, we would call 'continue' rather than simply exit this particular method of resolution. This was likely just a copy-paste mistake as the previous resolving steps all use loops where continue makes sense. Refactor the check so we only proceed if realpath is successful, and continue with the rest of the checks either way. 2) The real problem this code was trying to solve was canonicalizing path component (e.g., directory) symlinks. The final component, if not a directory, should not be handled at all in this loop. Add a !S_ISLNK() condition to the loop so we only call this for real files. There are few other small cleanups to the debug messages that I made while debugging this problem- we don't need to keep printing the file name, and ensure every block that sets resolved_conflict to true prints a debug message so we know how it was resolved. This fixes the expected failures from symlink010.py and symlink011.py, while still ensuring the fix for fileconflict007.py works. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-10-26Add some unowned symlink replacement testsDan McGee4-1/+77
These should all prevent installation, and yet two of the three tests currently fail. Not good. The best way to see what is going on here is to diff the three new tests side by side- there is only a small difference between the three tests, and that is in the destination of the symlink in question that should never be overwritten. symlink010.py: myprogsuffix -> myprog symlink011.py: myprogsuffix -> broken symlink012.py: myprogsuffix -> otherprog Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
2011-10-14Remove -f short option for --forceDan McGee5-5/+5
This is not something that should be used on a frequent basis, and giving it a short option encourages use without making the drawbacks obvious. For the 1% of situations that require it, the 5 extra keystrokes are a fair price to pay. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>