| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The main reason for this change is that scripts could not catch the removed
targets with -S --noconfirm (the return value was 0). So the effect of a
pacman command may have differed from the expected one. Moreover, for my
taste the default no answer is better (I wanted to install the specified
targets, not a subset of them).
I had to change some pactest files as well, because now the default behavior
is not to remove unresolvable targets. In fact, the only pactest file that
tested this feature was ignore005.py.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Enabled a new prompt to ask the user if they'd like to remove
unresolvable packages from the transaction rather than failing it.
Many pactest tests that used to fail now return success codes, because
pacman now issues a prompt allowing the user to cancel rather than
failing many transactions, and the pactest scripts always choose to
cancel with no error rather than failing. The only net effect is that
the return status of pacman is now 0 in cases where it used to be
nonzero.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Ischo <bryan@ischo.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Also remove some meaningless pactests (broken requiredby, requiredby*.py
tests). requiredby001.py was renamed to upgrade076.py.
Signed-off-by: Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|
|
Most of these new tests deal with provisions upon sync or upgrade being
changed by packages, and pacman not being smart enough to deal with
it yet.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dan@archlinux.org>
|