From 65dc7080d0d9e97bff51fb074f83b2d225b456cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: elij Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:43:37 -0700 Subject: renamed file to fit convention Signed-off-by: Loui Chang --- README | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+) create mode 100644 README (limited to 'README') diff --git a/README b/README new file mode 100644 index 0000000..12f64c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/README @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ +This is the finalized draft of the project requirements for the +new Arch package submittal process. AUR (Arch User-community Repo). +The sub-directories contain more specific implementation notes +for each component of the project. + + +Requirements: +------------- +1) User accounts (users, TUs) + - Create account. (email address required) + - Update account (change password/email address) + - Log in/out + +2) Search for packages (public) + - needs knowledge of ALL pkgs (OfficalRepos/AUR/Unsupported). This + should be easy enough if this site lives on the same machine as + the current package database (dragon?), or is allowed to query + the db. + - Display official repo (current/extra) a package lives in. + +3) Manual voting (requires user acct) + - reset/clear all votes (for starting over, this can be added later + if there is any demand for it) + +4) Package Management + - A package can be submitted by anyone (as long as they create + an account with a valid email address on the web site). From + there, a TU inspects the package and works with the submitter + to resolve any bugs/issues. Once approved, the TU can place the + package in the AUR. From there, if the package is popular enough + (or deemed necessary), a developer can move the package from the + AUR to extra/current/etc. A developer can also downgrade a + package from extra/current/etc to the AUR. + - The person that uploaded the new package can make changes to + it before it has been added to the AUR. + - TUs need to be able to purge packages in "Unsupported" if the + package is no longer maintained and there is no interest in + keeping it. + - Packages in the AUR/Unsupported need some sort of 'flag out of + date' support. + - Interested users can download the package from "Unsupported" + and build/install it by hand. + - Provide a separate installation of flyspray for tracking bugs + for packages living in the AUR. All bugs should be resolved + in either flyspray (AUR/official) prior to a package being + promoted/demoted. + +5) Reports + - package popularity by number of votes + +6) Wiki Docs (UID/GID db, provides db, irc nicks/names TUs/devs) + - Move the appropriate dev wiki pages to the new system's + wiki area. The devs will just need to consult the UID/GID + list from the new system site rather than our own wiki. + +7) Submitting 'new' packages by users. Initially start with + a simple web upload page where users submit a tgz containing + the PKGBUILD, scriptlets, patches, etc. The script will + unpack the tgz in an appropriate location and update the + backend database to 'register' the pacakge. + +8) TU package management + - A TU adopts a package from "Unsupported" and that shows users + and other TUs that the package is being reviewed. + - When the TU is ready to move the package to the AUR, they + use a custom utility/script that allows them to upload the + pkg.tar.gz (web uploads are inadequate for this process). + The upload utility/script has a server counterpart that + performs TU authentication and updates the database. + - A cronjob on the server can handle the new AUR package, + update the database, and rebuild the AUR sync db, and send + email notices to the TU about errors if any occur. + - The TUs should also be able to demote a package from the + AUR via the web interface. + - TUs will use cvs/svn interface (just like devs) to pull + down the PKGBUILD tree. This tree should reflect the same + layout as extra for easier package migration. They make + changes to their local copy, test, and then commit. They + use the xfer utility to upload the binary package to the + server. No shell access is required. + + +Automated Voting Tool (similar to ArchStats client) +===================== + +Requirements: +------------- + 1) Name of tool is 'pkgvote' + + 2) Requires registered account on web - email address not required + + 3) Casts 'yes' votes for all installed packages (except itself?) + +Implementation: +--------------- + A statically compiled C program that gathers the list of installed + packages and casts the vote to the web site. Very similar to the + way that ArchStats works now. When making the HTTP Post, it adds + a custom HEADER that the PHP script(s) can detect to know that it + is receiving a vote from a 'pkgvote' client. If the PHP script + does not see the special HEADER, it assumes it is a web browser + and gives the user HTML output. + + Once installed, the user edits the config file and supplies their + username/password. If no username/password exists in the config + file when it starts, it spits out an error message and exits. + -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf